As we began brainstorming
our tool, Charise and I wanted users to walk a way with a well-grounded sense
of key terms, the theorists talking about terms, and the dates of the conversation
of each term surrounding theories of genre- quite a large task at hand. Devitt
explains the necessity for grounding theories of genre in time, “Understanding
genre requires understanding more than just classification schemes; it requires
understanding the origins of the patterns on which those classifications are
based” (575). Hence, the termline: a timeline of theorists connected to
identified terms related to theories of genre. We decided to not only include
theorists from this week, but included the authors they referenced. To ground
our project, we identified essential terms from our readings relevant to
theories of genre. We also began organizing a list of theorists and terms they
are connected to, to give a better idea of out aim for the tool.
There are four parts to the
Termline: the search engine, timeline, theorists, and term thread. First, the
user is presented with a search bar in which they can search terms they think
most relevant to theories of genre. In addition to the search bar, a list of
words available on the site will be accessible to the user. We decided to add
this second feature of the home page since there are a limited number of terms
related to theories of genre. Once a term is searched or selected, the user is
brought to the term page. On the term page, a timeline is presented connecting
theorists who employed the term in conversation. Users are then able to see who
said what, when. Using the termline, users are then able to access articles to
read to conceptualize the selected term. Inspired by Trimbur’s theories of collaborative
learning, we also decided to provide a discussion forum for users to comment on
the term page. The discussions are organized much like a forum, by topics
created by users. Because we have allowed users to add theorists and articles
to the termline, we wanted to provide a space for them to also discuss their reasons
for doing so and a way to discuss relevant topics and “explore the rhetoric of
dissensus that pervades writing situations” (Trimbur 610).
We envision this tool being
used for research on theories of genre and as a rhetorical device to explore
ideas within a shared community that could potentially lead to further theory
building. We take up theories social constructivism as essential to the theory building
process and as such, embedded collaborative options into the termline. Because
we don’t see theories of genre as a flat entity, we want users to have the option
to add to the discussion and the tool.
Works Cited
Devitt, Amy. “Generalizing
about Genre: New Conceptions of an Old Concept.” CCC 44.4
(Dec. 1993): 573-586.
Trimbur, John. “Consensus and Difference in
Collaborative Learning.” College English 51.6 (Oct.1989): 602-16.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.